|
Many organizations go down a path of
operational improvement and find that either their improvement is slow and
incremental or that they run out of ideas. There may be several reason for
this however a major reason is likely to be the ‘mental models’ that they
bring to their business improvement efforts. To achieve significant and
sustainable improvements in business the people designing and driving the
effort need to employ double loop thinking.
Double loop thinking is a model for learning
and organizational change that originates in the work of Argryis and Schon
in 1974. The theory of double loop thinking can be summarized by
explaining the difference between single loop and double loop thinking.
Single loop thinking
has an emphasis on identifying differences between where you want to be
and where you are today. This type of thinking helps us to solve problems
in an incremental fashion using our current understanding of the world and
the way things work.
Double loop thinking
encourages us to challenge the basis of our assumptions about the world
and the way things work (Argryis and Schon call this our ‘governing
variables’). This means that instead of continually going through the same
continuos improvement cycle and using our existing mental models to
identify incremental improvements we need to challenge our thinking about
what ‘should be’.
The work or Argryis
and Schon focussed on change management and team learning. This approach
has usually been used as a tool for identifying the improvement
initiatives with the greatest likely impact. In this way, double loop
thinking is used to help change the mindset in a business and leads to
identifying fundamental changes rather than just quick fixes (although we
generally don’t acknowledge the quick fixes as being just that!). Double
loop thinking requires managers to challenge their beliefs, not only about
what is possible but what is the best way to go about achieving the
desired result. In fact, they may even challenge what they believe the end
result should be.
This is all great in
theory but how do we apply this is our businesses?
In the book
A New Strategy For Continuous Improvement a process of operational
improvement is provided that utilizes the principle of double loop
thinking.
Before explaining that
we need to review the classic approach to continuous improvement. Long
before the development of the 10 Steps it was recognized
that continuous improvement requires a cyclical approach. The
‘plan-do-check-act’ cycle in Figure 1 is a good example of this.
Figure 1: The Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
This cycle has been a
good tool over many years however it does have some limitations.
Specifically these are:
-
It provides no basis
on where to start. This classic approach really just says ‘start where
you are now and keep working’. This approach is flawed because there are
so many models of good practice that you could adopt without having to
‘reinvent the wheel’.
-
It is not
instructive. Plan-Do-Check-Act on what? What is needed is an approach
that gives some guidance on what to actually do to achieve the
improvement sought.
-
It encompasses only
single loop thinking. There is no challenge to the beliefs or
understanding of the implementer. You set your own framework, your own
mental model, and work towards that. Even though this might not be the
best course of action.
Achieving sustainable
cost reduction in a world of changing standards and management thinking
that constantly evolves is best achieved through the use of a continuos
improvement cycle that addresses each of these issues. In the book
A New Strategy for Continuous Improvement the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle has evolved to be
the Operations Improvement Cycle, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: The Operations Improvement Cycle
Double loop thinking is required in Stage 3: Renewal and Development. The
changing nature of business drives the need for a process of renewal.
Changes in areas such as market needs, technology development, product
range, product mix and economic cycles may all result in your business
requiring different needs over time. To account for these changes the
Operations Improvement Cycle focuses on the changing environment and
consideration of the impact of that change.
A common mistake in
business improvement is to assume either that the existing foundation is
appropriate for the business environment or that it cannot change. That
is, the company is doing all the right things and cannot improve upon the
basics. As a result companies can move too quickly into the second stage,
Optimize Performance.
The move to Optimize
Performance feels good because it requires action and taking action
provides a sense of accomplishment. This action, however, may only
reinforce existing problems and may not drive a long-term sustainable
result. For example, if a company uses an inappropriate forecasting
technique, no amount of optimization will drive sustainable improvement, a
change in fundamentals is required first.
Too often, businesses
remain in the Optimize Performance stage and fail to move onto Renewal and
Development. In this case they may reach a ‘dead end’ in their thinking
where little more can be achieved. At that point they tell themselves
that they have done all that can be done and more or less give up on
continuos improvement. This is where they need to apply double loop
thinking and challenge the actual basis of what they are trying to achieve
and the methods they are using to achieve that outcome.
The issue, therefore,
should not be one of ‘if it ain’t broke don’t fix it’ but rather one of
‘it ain’t broke, but is it still relevant?’ The Steps associated with
Stage 3 Renewal and development are:
Step #8:
Question Everything
If you partition your
thinking with a ‘hands off’ approach to some parts of the business, then
you will also limit the opportunity to improve the processes that interact
with those parts of the business.
Step #9:
Take Some Chances
By its very nature,
progress requires the adoption of new actions and this will involve some
risk. Innovation often requires a ‘leap of faith’. The key is to
recognize, understand and manage the risk associated with taking chances.
Step#10:
Ignore Tradition
It is now a cliché that
change is the only constant. What worked well yesterday might not be the
best option today. In fact, the processes that are refined and optimized
in the first 9 steps of this program may, at some stage, become obsolete.
If we accept that this is possible, then we must constantly be aware of
the need to ignore our past constraints. Not because something is
‘broken’ but because markets, products, companies, circumstance and
technology all change.
The message here is
that the cycle must be worked through consciously and honestly. Short cuts
may appear to provide progress but they rarely drive sustainable results.
Double loop thinking is an approach that enables the identification of
breakthrough actions that change not only what you manage but also how you
manage it.
About The Author
Phillip Slater is
the author of the book
A New Strategy
For Continuous Improvement. For more
information visit his website at
http://www.InitiateAction.com.
Note: You are welcome to
reprint this article online on the condition that it remains complete and
unaltered (including the ‘About the author’ info at the end) and you send
a reprint to
enquiries@InitiateAction.com
|